Posts Tagged ‘agreement’

Pledging Commercial Real Estate as Pension Contributions?

Friday, July 17th, 2009
From CalPERS’ lawsuit against credit agencies, we go to another more interesting lawsuit. The WSJ reports that Delphi retirees are suing over a plan to end pensions:

A group of retirees of Delphi Corp. (DPHIQ) filed suit Thursday, saying it needs an independent administrator to help stop the bankrupt auto supplier from terminating its pension plan for salaried employees and transferring the obligation to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

In a federal lawsuit filed in Michigan, the Delphi Salaried Retiree Association asked the court to replace its current trustees, who are Delphi executives, and appoint a new plan administrator “loyal only to us.”

The suit also seeks an immediate injunction prohibiting the current plan administrator from negotiating a termination with the PBGC until this suit is concluded.

“We have serious concerns about whether Delphi executives can protect our pension rights while at the same time serving Delphi’s shareholders and creditors,” the retiree group said.

The group said it was not notified before Delphi announced its PBGC plan June 1.

Separately, the association filed an objection in the Delphi bankruptcy case to a provision stating the pension plan, by agreement, shall be terminated and transferred to the PBGC.

On Monday, General Motors Co. moved closer to buying its former parts unit Delphi when a bankruptcy judge said GM could move forward with a plan that will allow the auto maker to team up with a private-equity firm to buy Delphi and take it out of bankruptcy.

The deal, approved by Judge Robert Gerber of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan, is designed to ensure GM a steady supply of parts and allow Delphi to exit bankruptcy after nearly four years in Chapter 11.

But another New York bankruptcy judge, who is overseeing Delphi’s bankruptcy case, also needs to sign off on the agreement. That hearing is scheduled for next week.

Meanwhile, Delphi’s lenders said Thursday that they will bid for the auto-parts supplier this week and try to defeat the sale to GM and the private-equity firm.

One condition of the GM agreement is Delphi will not be on the hook for unfunded pensions for its hourly workers, an amount that totals about $3.2 billion. GM, Delphi and the government’s pension watchdog are negotiating an agreement by which GM would assume some or all of those pension costs, court document show.

Delphi, which was spun off from GM in 1999 and filed for bankruptcy in 2005, has seen its value plunge amid falling auto sales and has struggled for more than a year to pull together the financing it needs to exit bankruptcy.

Delphi officials were not immediately available for comment.

It is worth watching developments out of this Delphi lawsuit very carefully. I have to agree with the Delphi Salaried Retiree Association that they need to find a new plan administrator “loyal to them”, but they are going to have a tough battle proving this in court.
In another interesting development, CoStar Group reports about a deal where commercial real estate was pledged in lieu of cash for pension contributions:

YRC Worldwide Inc., the financially troubled Overland Park, KS, trucking company, completed a pension contribution deferral agreement with the Teamsters Union to defer the payment of $94 million of contributions due last month.

In exchange, YRC has pledged real property so that the union has first priority security interest in the property. The real estate is located throughout the United States and Mexico.

YRC Inc., USF Holland Inc., USF Reddaway Inc. and New Penn Motor Express, Inc., made the deal with the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund with Wilmington Trust Co., as agent. The Central States Pension Fund is the largest of the Company’s International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”) multiemployer defined benefit pension funds, representing approximately 58% of the company’s pension funding obligations.

The initial agreement covered $83 million in pension contributions. Since the initial agreement, seven additional union funds have joined as participants in the same agreement for a deferral of an additional $11 million.

If YRC were to default on cash contributions, the union funds would have the right to foreclosure on the pledged properties.

Unions better be careful accepting pledges of commercial real estate in lieu of cash as pension contributions. Forbes recently interviewed the world’s best real estate investor, Tom Barrack of Colony Capital, who said he expects a refinancing crunch over the next few years to cause misery:
I quote the following from Mr. Barrack (but read the entire article):

“It’s bad and it’s getting worse at the moment. The $700 billion commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) market still has no new money for buyers or refinancing. About a third of that is due at the end of 2010 and 2011 and the majority between 2010 and 2012. So you have $750 billion in refinancing needed over the next 24 months and you don’t have one lender.”

On that cheerful note, I am off to the southern part of Rethymno, Crete to enjoy a weekend of tranquility and reading my books. I am seriously wondering whether or not to return to Montreal where I hear the weather has been miserable this summer.
http://pensionpulse.blogspot.com/2009/07/commercial-real-estate-as-pension.html
reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC  canadian funding corp CEO

Don’t Sell the Minivan By Mistake!

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

By Brian Madigan LL.B.

Ordinarily, one would think that chattels are not included in an agreement of purchase and sale concerning real estate. And, most of the time they would be right.

However, this is not the case when we are talking about the sale of a business. Under the Real Estate and Business Brokers Act the term “real estate” is defined to include real property, leasehold and business whether with or without premises, fixtures, stock-in-trade, goods or chattels in connection with the operation of the business.

Bob operated a small electrical contracting company. After 25 years in the business, he felt that it was time to retire. In addition to the 10 trucks all clearly marked “Bob’s Electric”, he had recently purchased a minivan. Bob used this vehicle to get to work. He acquired it right at the end of the year so that he could maximize the depreciation. Bob listed the business and negotiated an excellent price.

You might imagine his surprise when it came to the day of closing and his lawyer had prepared a Transfer of the minivan for him to sign. Bob said it was not part of the deal. There was nothing about the minivan in the agreement of purchase and sale. This was true!

His lawyer reviewed the agreement and said that the definition of “real estate” when it concerned the sale of a business included chattels. Since the minivan had been acquired and used in connection with the business, no matter how remote this connection might be, the minivan was deemed to be part of the deal. The obligation rested upon Bob to clearly exclude it, if that was his intention. It did not have to be written into the agreement to become part of the deal. Silence meant the minivan was part of the deal.

So, on closing the purchaser received an assignment of the lease, the stock-in-trade, the fixtures, the 10 trucks, and to his surprise, Bob’s brand new minivan that he drove to work.

In addition, there is one more little problem here worth mentioning. Bob was attracted to the minivan because of the zero percent financing spread out over five years. You guessed it! The agreement of purchase and sale conveyed the title to the assets “free and clear of all encumbrances”. So, out of the funds due on closing, Bob had to pay off the loan on the minivan in order that the purchaser would get clear title.

This little glitch arises in many business transactions, but most of the time neither the buyer nor the seller are aware, and no one asks about the minivan that the owner uses to get to work. There was some good news however. Bob had been thinking about buying a Mercedes.

http://ontariorealestatesource.blogspot.com/2009/07/dont-sell-minivan-by-mistake.html

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, canadian funding corp CEO